MATIC 代币所有者是否拥有合同中包含的 ETH？

Question

嘿！我正在探索加密世界，在我的Trezor以太坊浏览器中遇到了一些奇怪的东西. 除了我的合约Matic代币外，还有一些以太坊代币出现. 我对谁真正拥有这些 ETH 代币的所有权感到头疼. 它们是我的是因为我拥有 MATIC 代币，还是它们完全属于别人？如果能澄清错误汇到合约地址的资金会怎样，我将不胜感激.

The Web3 Diva · Answer

Its important to understand that the validator, part of the blockchain operation, earns fees from transaction validations, not from mistakenly sent funds. These validators ensure the smooth operation of transactions, but they don’t have any claim over mistakenly sent tokens.

Cattos · Answer

In the blockchain ecosystem, when funds are sent to a contract address by mistake, the contract address itself becomes the owner. However, a contract address is not a wallet that can individually control these tokens, so often they become irretrievable and trapped there. This is why individuals who sent the funds have essentially lost them.

loth.broke · Answer

The ETH tokens youre seeing are likely not owned by you. Those tokens have probably been sent to the contract address erroneously by others. This is a common mistake, and once tokens are sent to a contract address, they typically cannot be retrieved and are effectively lost.

0xae84...9d4b · Answer

No, owning MATIC tokens does not grant ownership of any ETH that appears in a contract address. What youre seeing in your Trezor Ethereum Explorer is likely ETH that has been mistakenly sent to the contract address by others, not funds that belong to you. In the blockchain ecosystem, contract addresses are not like personal wallets. They do not have an individual or entity controlling them unless the contract has specific functionality allowing withdrawals or transfers. When ETH is sent to a contract that is not designed to handle it, those funds are usually stuck there permanently. Unlike a wallet, which has private keys that allow access, a smart contract follows its programmed rules. If it wasn’t designed to return or move ETH, then those tokens remain locked. This is a common mistake, and it often happens when someone misunderstands how token contracts work. For example, MATIC tokens on Ethereum exist within a contract, but that contract does not inherently have access to ETH unless explicitly programmed to receive and use it. If ETH appears in the contract’s balance, it means someone sent it there, but unless the contract has a withdrawal function, those funds cannot be recovered. If you’re seeing ETH in the contract address and wondering whether it’s accessible, you can check the contract’s code on a block explorer like Etherscan. If the contract includes a method to withdraw ETH, there may be a way for the rightful sender (not MATIC holders) to retrieve it. Otherwise, the ETH is effectively lost.

MATIC 代币所有者是否拥有合同中包含的 ETH？

答案

你知道答案吗？